hotel rwanda - 966 Words

In just one hundred days, almost one million people were murdered in the genocide rampage that swept through Rwanda, Africa in 1994. Hotel Rwanda, a film directed by Terry George in 2004, is a story based on the tragedy that occurred ten years prior. The massacre is a result of the Hutu tribe’s prejudice and discrimination of the Tutsi tribe and the world’s lack of intervention. George’s depiction of the event is less about the massacre itself though because of his choice to portray it from the view of Paul Rusesabagina, a Hutu hotel manager married to a Tutsi woman. Mass media hasn’t always been the way it is today. Movies are now one of the most popular forms of entertainment and one of the most efficient ways of sending a message.†¦show more content†¦George’s film doesn’t skip over any of the gruesome details. None of the tears or fighting and bloodshed are skipped. The emotions of the people in Africa, terrified, hopeless, and d istraught, are also portrayed in the film without censoring. Terry George is also able to keep the American audience’s attention with his choice of telling the story from Paul’s point of view. Instead of letting them see the events from a strictly objective and factual point of view, they see how the destruction affected a real person. Paul’s willingness to help others and sacrifice himself to keep his family safe brought out sympathy the audience didn’t feel before. Hotel Rwanda is a movie not meant to just entertain. Terry George shed light on the audiences of the real events that occurred. He was able to get people to react in a way they failed to when they should have. George also kept the attention of America by not covering up any of the details of the tragedy in Africa many may haveShow MoreRelated Hotel Rwanda Essay607 Words   |  3 PagesHotel Rwanda Some people can’t resist trying to be someone they really aren’t. In the film Hotel Rwanda, the main character changed his own styles just to fit in with the Europeans and think that the Europeans will treat them as if he was a real European. And when times of crisis come along, he finds out that the Europeans have always looked down at them. After that, he understands that what he’s been doing was not himself and he changes. Paul RusesabaginaRead MoreEssay on Rwanda Genocide Compared with Hotel Rwanda2521 Words   |  11 Pagescentral African country of Rwanda. The Hutus and the Tutsis, two ethnic groups within Rwanda, have been at continual unrest for the past half a century. During the 100 day massacre of 1994, a murder occurred every two seconds; resulting in 18% of the Tutsi population being killed. A decade after the war, in 2004, the film Hotel Rwanda was released. The film followed the story of a Hutu man; Paul Rusesabagina as he housed over 1200 Tutsi refugees in his hotel. The Hotel De Milles Collines, a five-starRead MoreMovie Analysis : Hotel Rwanda1519 Words   |  7 PagesThe based on a true story trademark of the film Hotel Rwanda has implications for genocidal memory, post genocidal peace and reconciliation, and the promotion of heroism amid the udder chaos that engulfed the country. The film ultimately illustrates an oversimplified, ideologically driven version of the 1994 mass acre. It emphasizes the role of a Hollywood hero, rather than the deeply rooted and complex factors at the center of the violence, leading to popular opinion of the Hutu population as barbaricRead MoreMovie Report : On The Hotel Rwanda1237 Words   |  5 Pages For my movie report I watched the the film on the Hotel Rwanda (2004), which follows the true-life story of the war in Rwanda between the Hutu and Tutsi tribes. When the Hutu tribe wants redemption from the Tutsi rule which left them in repression by the Belgiums, the Hutu’s create violent militas, war gangs, and set out to murder almost a million people in the length of this awful genocide that the UN restrained from becoming involved in. Once the assassination of the President Habyarimana occursRead MoreMovie Review : Hotel Rwanda2038 Words   |  9 PagesHotel Rwanda is a film that made me cry many times throughout the film. This film most definitely goes to show how cruel many people in this world can be. This fi lm is about the genocide in Rwanda where thousands of Tutsi’s were killed because they were being blamed for everything going wrong in the country. It appears that many people want someone to blame for their own losses and troubles so they will go as far as to attempt to murder a whole group of people. In Hotel Rwanda, the film begins withRead MoreHotel Rwanda By Terry George975 Words   |  4 PagesPossibly the saddest and most tragic event that occurred in the last few decades was the genocide of the Tutsi population in Rwanda by the Hutu led government and Hutu people of the same country. Hotel Rwanda by Terry George is a film adaption of the experiences of a Tutsi hotel manager Paul Rusesabagina who sheltered and kept safe several thousand Hutu refugees during the genocide. This film clearly portrays its major themes such as ethnic conflict, the lack of human rights, and many other socialRead MoreTaking a Look at Hotel Rwanda600 Words   |  2 Pagesreceived from the Tutsis, they did not even initiate themselves to come help the Tutsis. This is viewed as such a bad thing that they did due to them obviously not being all together and apart of the same group because they did not even go to help Rwanda when they claimed that they would be the ones to help keep peace between eve ryone. It took a long time for the UN to actually step in, this is inferred through the movie and the 100 days that the genocide lasted, just think if the UN would of steppedRead MoreDr. Morris s Hotel Rwanda1067 Words   |  5 PagesMorris Video Review Paper Hotel Rwanda The Rwandan genocide occurred in 1994 between the two prevalent ethnic groups in Rwanda, the Hutu and the Tutsi. Hotel Rwanda documents the plight of Paul Rusesabagina, a hotel manager, who opens his hotel as a shelter for the Tutsi people during the Rwandan genocide, saving thousands of lives in the processes. Through bribes Rusesabagina was able to keep thousands of Tutsi people from death. Like many other African states, Rwanda was colonized by a EuropeanRead MoreNight and Hotel Rwanda Similarities Essay1009 Words   |  5 PagesNight and Hotel Rwanda Similarities Throughout the course of humanity, we have experienced terrible transgressions in our society. Although they took place sixty-one years apart, similar horrific events from the Holocaust (1933-1945) and the Rwandan Genocide (1994) occurred. In Night, the Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state sponsored persecution and murder of approximately 6 million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. The Nazis believed they were â€Å"racially superior†Read MoreMy Personal Reaction On Hotel Rwanda Essay933 Words   |  4 Pages Hotel Rwanda Introduction In this essay I will write of my personal reaction on the movie Hotel Rwanda. This movie left me with a plethora of mixed emotions. Yet, it taught me many lessons on life and the world. From its historical background to its most recent movie filmed in 2004. Background Information Mille Collines was the main setting of this movie. It was a four-star hotel located in Kigali, Rwanda where Americans, French, and many more tourists would go for a calm oasis. Kigali

The Great Depression Was A Climactic Defining Moment In

The Great Depression was a climactic defining moment in the 20 century that crushed the lives of numerous americans in the United States. Its kickoff was Black Thursday, October 24, 1929. That is when merchants sold 12.9 million of dollars of stock in one day. It was triple the standard sum. Throughout the following four days, stock costs fell 23 percent. That is known as money markets crash of 1929. For all the more, optically observe When Did the Depression Begin? In spite of the fact that the U.S. economy had gone into despondency six months prior, the depression might be verbalized to have initiated with a crumple of securities exchange costs on the Beginning York Stock Trade in October 1929. Amid the following three years stock†¦show more content†¦So once the American economy drooped and the stream of American venture credits to Europe went away, flourishing slanted to fall there too. The Depression hit hardest those countries that were most profoundly obliged to the U nited States, i.e., Germany and Awesome England. In Germany, unemployment climbed strongly starting in late 1929, and by mid 1932 it had achieved 6 million specialists, or 25 percent of the work constrain. England was less thoroughly influenced, yet its mechanical and fare divisions remained seriously discouraged until World War II. Numerous different nations had been influenced by the droop by 1931. Practically all countries tried to forfend their household engenderment by forcing duties, raising subsisting ones, and setting quantities on peregrine imports. The impact of these prohibitive measures was to significantly lessen the volume of worldwide exchange: by 1932 the aggregate estimation of world exchange had fallen by more than a moiety as a great many countries took measures against the importation of peregrine products. The Depression had considerable outcomes in the political circle. In the United States, financial pain prompted to the decision of the Democrat Franklin D. Ro osevelt to the administration in late 1932.Show MoreRelatedOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesnineteenth century, which was ushered in by the industrial and political revolutions of the late 1700s. But at the same time, without serious attention to the processes and misguided policies that led to decades of agrarian and industrial depression from the late 1860s to the 1890s, as well as the social tensions and political rivalries that generated and were in turn fed by imperialist expansionism, one cannot begin to comprehend the causes and consequences of the Great War that began in 1914.

Role Of Airplanes In World War II Essay Example For Students

Role Of Airplanes In World War II Essay Role ofAirplanes in World War IIChapter 1: War itselfFlying started when the first people onearth saw a bird flying in the sky, we were amazed of seeing how freelythey could move and to know that you could reach any place on earth withthis ability, since then our dream had been follow them. People then triedto make this dream possible, the result in all cases was serious pain andfailure after failure. A lot of time passed since the first time we dreamedof being able to fly, but we finally achived this goal. Two brothers wereable to do the first flight on history, this brothers were the Wrightsbrothers who achived the goal of all the humankind, even know when someonethinks of airplanes they think on the Wrights brothers, because thanksto them in 1903 the world had his first flying machine. But the planesstatus changed because of time. The porpuse of this flying machines wasto achive our goal, to fly and see the world, to imitate wonderful animalssuch as birds, but people had never thought that they could use airplanesas a war machine. After it was invented we were so eager to seek destructionthat we saw the potential of using it to kill ourselves. It all startedwhen we saw that people on the ground were indefencseless with this newwar toy. They found a lot of new uses for it for example: they used themto spy on their enemys, to know where they were heading, to make maps andstartegies on what will be the most useful way of attacking them, and thiswas its use during the first World War. This war was fought on land noton the air as the second war. People didn?t knew that their dreamcould be their mourder. After the war ended countries startedto look how to improve their new war toys, they put factories to try tomake airplanes reach a higher velocity, altitutde, range etc There wasa war between wars to see who was better, Americans made their airplanes,English tried to make their Royal Air Force the best one, Japanese wantedto make their airplanes lighter and faster, but the real winner in thiswar were the Germans, their airplanes could travel long range, they wereeasy to maniubrate and ofcourse they were able to use them for massivedestruction against other countries. Thanks to airplanes the Germans werethe powerful nation they were during the war. But why did Germans built better airplanes,well there were some reasons like :Germans live in a country with many mountains,people liked to fly model airplanes and make contests to see which werethe best ones, from this models a lot of airplanes were constructed. Anotherreason was that their scientists were very ingenious, people wanted revengefrom all the other countries. Their curiosity and their intelligence leadthem to make the best war toys in hisotory of war. After World War I Germans were humiliated,they burned their own money for fuel. They had nothing left, they justseeked for revenge, war has always been part of Germans culture. But anotherthing Germans have is that they are really smart, they dream of makingthings but they have a difference over all other nations, they dreams dobecome true, but they become true because of their intelligence and becausethey never give up. The versailled treatment was just like a tentationto make they come to life again, they realized to late that this treatmentwas not peace, it was just an intermission for the worst war ever in history,the first in where land, air and sea were involved. Logic happened the Germans broke the Versaillestrateament and started to build a strong army, they used all their moneyfor warfare, between this machines was the airplane. Airplanes were consideredthe most valuable arm the Germans had, with this machines they could bombentire cities in just questions of days and then send their soldiers tofinish the work making war very fast and easy to win, this concept wasknow as the Blitz Krieg. Some of this airplanes were the U2 bomber andhis brother, they were a two engine plane that could carry a larg numberof bombs and soldiers for attack.. Countries as Poland and Austria sawhow easily their armys were defeated because of this new war machines thatGermans were using. They didnt realized that for fighting this mounsterthey had to know what they were fighting, they were fighting against notonly man but against technology the new best friend of blood and war. Perceptual Development EssayChapter 2: What it leted us, what it tookAlmost at the end of the war the firstturbo engine was used they started to use this engines instead of the oldones because they were faster. And the first ones to use this were theGermans, maybe that?s why they were in control of almost all of thewar, they had the technology that other countries didn?t had. Their airplanes could travel almost at 800 km/hr, almost the double ofthe other airplanes, but their use was almost at the end of the war sothey coudn?t do a lot in this war. The allies were impressed whenthe first saw this airplanes, they were amazed of their speed, and everythingthey could offer. That?s why people started to use many of this advancesin their common use for traveling that?s why trips were so much faster. The kind of gear used for flying changeda lot in this times, the tires were made more resistable, the planes weremade to support higher pressures and to carry large amounts of weight,the controls of the planes were now easier to fly etc many advances weremade. Because the technology changes everything that exists on this worldthe airplane didn?t went outside of this change, they had changedthanks to things as the advances of technology. It?s how theworld is fixed, just as technology is made better, things are made smallerand more efficient. Maybe that?s why technology is afactor that affects living things in this world day by day. This is whathappened in world war II, there was a new way of how things were done,the used tanks for rapid land attacks and during this war the airplanewas considered really a war instrument. Because of the advances in technologymade in the airplane there was a new kind of war going around. But maybe too much advance on this machineswas not the best thing that could happen because this caused the deathof million of people, and this can?t be justified not even now sayingthat thanks to them planes are faster and a more common thing because Iam shure Ill give up all this advances for a world in which every yearwe didnt had to remember things that happened as this horrible war. ConclusionBecause of this technological advanceswar was something that people could never had imagine. This was a verydestructive machine and made war to be relied on machines rather than onsoldiers. But it also made this war very destructive and cruel. Technologybrings advances to society but if they are misused then problems can occur,millions of people could die and countries could be destroyed. Things arewhat people want to make them to be, if things are not used correctly thenproblems happen, this is just part of my report later on I will explainmore about each kind of plane and about how technology made airplanes avery destructive and effective machine.

The Mesozoic Era free essay sample

In this report I will be explaining a few facts about the Mesozoic era coming from the documentary â€Å"The day the Mesozoic Died†. This small film expresses how in many ways these creatures once inhabited our planet and disappeared completely in almost a blink of an eye. The Mesozoic Era could also be described simply as what most of our population knows as the Dinosaur Era. These creatures once dominated our lands with tremendous sizes, shapes and species and although humans were never able to see one in person, there are many ways in which our scientists and geologists have found to identify what they looked like and how they behaved. Thanks to their effort, we can now understand the tremendous creatures who lived before us and assume theories as well as research to find out why and how they were completely wiped out our planet one day. Body The disappearance of dinosaurs is considered a mystery for many reasons. We will write a custom essay sample on The Mesozoic Era or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page We as humans have no live proof of what really happened that day the Mesozoic left the world. There are many theories as to what could’ve happened. On the other hand, the most common one could be derived from the information found by geologists all over the world discovering unusual patterns on the rocks and mountains of certain places. Within the discoveries found all around the world scientists have found a few rare chemical elements in the process of the search. Some of the chemical elements included were the iridium, cosmic space dust, the isotope plutonium 244 and sulfur as well. Currently, the main suspect behind this catastrophe is a cosmic impact from an asteroid or comet, an idea first proposed by physicist Luis Alvarez and his son geologist Walter Alvarez. Scientists later found that signs of this collision seemed evident near the town of Chicxulub in Mexico in the form of a gargantuan crater more than 110 miles (180 kilometers) wide. The explosion, likely caused by an object about 6 miles (10 km) across, would have released as much energy as 100 trillion tons of TNT, more than a billion times more than the atom bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, further work suggested the Chicxulub impact occurred either 300,000 years before or 180,000 years after the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. The scientists involved in this investigation were Sean B. Carroll, Alan Hidebrand, Kirk Johnson, Mark Nielsen, and Jan Smit. The places visited in the film to prove the investigation were Gubbio, Italy, Zumaia, Spain, Brazos river, Texas, Dakotas and Montana. They found many pieces of evidence for example patterns, rocks, leaves and elements. But the most important piece of evidence was the crater in the gulf of Mexico called the Chicxulub which led out to match every hypothesis the geologists made. The chemical elements they discovered were important for the fact they are not Earth made elements and come from outer space. The investigation took place in 2012. My personal opinion for this film would be that I think its really great. It was outstanding information and a very interesting topic as it is one of my favorites. Conclusion In conclusion, this specific topic is one of huge interest expressed all around the world. The events that happened on that very day the dinosaurs disappeared are a huge contribution to our history. It was a very tragic event, but yet it could be expressed as the most important one. Why is it important? Without the end of the Mesozoic era, there would have been no beginning to our era. Without the dinosaur wipeout, there would be no us. We cant completely say that all Mesozoic died on that day. There are still creatures among us who participated in that era. It is believed that some reptiles such as Alligators and lizards are related to dinosaurs, as well as a few other creatures. Now a days scientists and geologists still live with the mystery and are still trying to find more pieces of evidence or fossils that might remain. It is important to know our past, therefor we must be thankful of what such a tragic event gave birth to up to this day, us mammals and the centuries we have lived and move on to keep living.

Battle of Cold Harbor - Civil War

Battle of Cold Harbor - Civil War Battle of Cold Harbor - Conflict Dates: The Battle of Cold Harbor was fought May 31-June 12, 1864, and was part of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Armies Commanders: Union Lieutenant General Ulysses S. GrantMajor General George G. Meade108,000 men Confederate General Robert E. Lee62,000 men Battle of Cold Harbor - Background: Pressing on with his Overland Campaign after confrontations at the Wilderness, Spotsylvania Court House, and North Anna, Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant again moved around Confederate General Robert E. Lees right in an effort to capture Richmond. Crossing the Pamunkey River, Grants men fought skirmishes at Haws Shop, Totopotomoy Creek, and Old Church. Pushing his cavalry forward towards the crossroads at Old Cold Harbor, Grant also ordered Major General William Baldy Smiths XVIII Corps to move from Bermuda Hundred to join the main army. Recently reinforced, Lee anticipated Grants designs on Old Cold Harbor and dispatched cavalry under Brigadier Generals Matthew Butler and Fitzhugh Lee to the scene. Arriving they encountered elements of Major General Philip H. Sheridans cavalry corps. As the two forces skirmished on May 31, Lee sent Major General Robert Hokes division as well as Major General Richard Andersons First Corps to Old Cold Harbor. Around 4:00 PM, Union cavalry under Brigadier General Alfred Torbert and David Gregg succeeded in driving the Confederates from the crossroads. Battle of Cold Harbor - Early Fighting: As the Confederate infantry began arrive late in the day, Sheridan, concerned about his advanced position, withdrew back towards Old Church. Wishing to exploit the advantage gained at Old Cold Harbor, Grant ordered Major General Horatio Wrights VI Corps to the area from Totopotomoy Creek and ordered Sheridan to hold the crossroads at all costs. Moving back to Old Cold Harbor around 1:00 AM on June 1, Sheridans horsemen were able to reoccupy their old position as the Confederates had failed to notice their early withdrawal. In an effort to re-take the crossroads, Lee ordered Anderson and Hoke to attack the Union lines early on June 1. Anderson failed to relay this order to Hoke and the resulting attack consisted only of First Corps troops. Moving forward, troops from Kershaws Brigade led the assault and were met with savage fire from Brigadier General Wesley Merritts entrenched cavalry. Using seven-shot Spencer carbines, Merritts men quickly beat back the Confederates. Around 9:00 AM, the lead elements of Wrights corps began arriving on the field and moved into the cavalrys lines. Battle of Cold Harbor - Union Movements: Though Grant had wished IV Corps to attack immediately, it was exhausted from marching most of the night and Wright elected to delay until Smiths men arrived. Reaching Old Cold Harbor in early afternoon, XVIII Corps began entrenching on Wrights right as the cavalry retired east. Around 6:30 PM, with minimal scouting of the Confederate lines, both corps moved to the attack. Storming forward over unfamiliar ground they were met by heavy fire from Anderson and Hokes men. Though a gap in the Confederate line was found, it was quickly closed by Anderson and the Union troops were forced to retire to their lines. While the assault had failed, Grants chief subordinate, Major General George G. Meade, commander of the Army of the Potomac, believed an attack the next day could be successful if enough force was brought against the Confederate line. To achieve this, Major General Winfield S. Hancocks II Corps was shifted from Totopotomoy and placed on Wrights left. Once Hancock was in position, Meade intended to move forward with three corps before Lee could prepare substancial defenses. Arriving early on June 2, II Corp was tired from their march and Grant agreed to delay the attack until 5:00 PM to allow them to rest. Battle of Cold Harobr - Regrettable Assaults: The assault was again delayed that afternoon until 4:30 AM on June 3. In planning for the attack, both Grant and Meade failed to issue specific instructions for the assaults target and trusted their corps commanders to reconnoiter the ground on their own. Though unhappy at the lack of direction from above, the Union corps commanders failed to take the initiative by scouting their lines of advance. For those in the ranks who had survived frontal assaults at Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania, a degree of fatalism took hold and many pinned paper containing their name to their uniforms to aid in identifying their body. While Union forces delayed on June 2, Lees engineers and troops were busy constructing an elaborate system of fortifications containing pre-ranged artillery, converging fields of fire, and various obstacles. To support the assault, Major General Ambrose Burnsides IX Corps and Major General Gouverneur K. Warrens V Corps were formed at the north end of the field with orders to attack Lieutenant General Jubal Earlys corps on Lees left. Moving forward through the early morning fog, XVIII, VI, and II Corps quickly encountered heavy fire from the Confederate lines. Attacking, Smiths men were channeled into two ravines where they were cut down in large numbers halting their advance. In the center, Wrights men, still bloodied from June 1, were quickly pinned down and made little effort to renew the attack. The only success came on Hancocks front where troops from Major General Francis Barlows division succeeded in breaking through the Confederate lines. Recognizing the danger, the breach was quickly sealed by the Confederates who then proceeded to throw back the Union attackers. In the north, Burnside launched a sizable attack on Early, but halted to regroup after mistakenly thinking he had shattered the enemy lines. As the assault was failing, Grant and Meade pressed their commanders to push forward with little success. By 12:30 PM, Grant conceded that the assault had failed and Union troops began digging in until they could withdraw under the cover of darkness. Battle of Cold Harbor - Aftermath: In the fighting, Grants army had sustained 1,844 killed, 9,077 wounded, and 1,816 captured/missing. For Lee, the losses were a relatively light 83 killed, 3,380 wounded, and 1,132 captured/missing. Lees final major victory, Cold Harbor led to an increase in anti-war sentiment in the North and criticisms of Grants leadership. With the failure of the assault, Grant remained in place at Cold Harbor until June 12 when he moved the army away and succeeded in crossing the James River. Of the battle, Grant stated in his memoirs: I have always regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made. I might say the same thing of the assault of the 22d of May, 1863, at Vicksburg. At Cold Harbor no advantage whatever was gained to compensate for the heavy loss we sustained.

Critical Analysis on Summer Reading essays

Critical Analysis on Summer Reading essays Books have been around for over a millennium, while the motion picture industry is no more than a century old. Despite this age difference, many of the qualities that make a book deep and entertaining are no different than what makes those two hours at your local cinema so immersive. Occasionally, a book will even take the form of a movie or visa-verse. Many times, however, a book that would seem rather irrelevant to a movie of a completely different nature may have more in common than one would assume. A great example of this literary connection is the similarity between the novel In the Time of the Butterflies by Julia Alvarez and the movie Jakob the Liar starring Robin Williams. Three themes that are portrayed throughout both stories are hope, the utilization of propaganda, and using corruption to gain power. Propaganda plays a big role in both stories. For example, in Jakob the Liar, a Russian propaganda radio broadcast tells of German defeat, and Jakob spreads the news around the ghetto. Meanwhile, the Nazi regime is using propaganda to convince the German people that they are in control of the war effort. Similarly, an example of the use of propaganda in In the Time of the Butterflies is the twisted and guiltless lies about General Raphael Trujillo. He was viewed as a saint by all those who were ignorant of his ruthless regime. Those who were educated and did speak up did so at the cost of their lives. Through propaganda, Trujillo proclaims himself as more than just a president but a divine King. When she is still fairly young, Minerva Mirabal even admits, At home, Trujillo hung on the wall by the picture of Our Lord Jesus with a whole flock of the cutest lambs (Alvarez 17). Although no evil man like Trujillo should ever be viewed as equal to a God, at least this type of propaganda i s not physically harmful. The corruption and dishonesty needed to reach that point, however, is much more treacherous. ...

Schools of Strategy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

Schools of Strategy - Essay Example Also this school makes chief executive officer as the main formulator of the strategy. The planning school of strategy identifies strategy making as a formal process. It calls for a mechanical and systematic process of strategy formulation with no or little creativity. The cognitive school sees strategy making as a mental process and takes input from different concepts of psychology. This school is largely conceptual in nature. The learning school stresses on learning from past experience and therefore sees strategy making as an emergent process. The power school of strategy argues that negotiating between different power holders within the organization is an important part of strategy formulation. The environmental school sees strategy making as a reactive process that is dependent on the external environment. The cultural school of strategy calls for group work in formulation of strategy. The configuration school of strategy sees strategy making as a process of transformation. The different schools of strategy can be grouped into three larger groups (Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, & Lampel, 2002). First group is prescriptive in nature and consist of design, planning, and positioning school. This group tells how a strategy should ideally be made. Second group tells how the strategy is made and compromises of entrepreneurial, cognitive, learning, power, cultural, and environmental schools. The last group consists of the configuration school that is both prescriptive and descriptive in nature. Design School of Strategy The design school of strategy argues in favor of consciously controlled thought when it comes to strategy making in order to establish a fit between external opportunities and internal competence (Mintzberg, 2006).... This paper stresses that the position school also puts the job of strategy formulation in the hands of expert. Both the schools do not talk about team work and sharing of information when it comes to development of strategy. Centralized approach in strategy making was the mindset for a long time in management. Knowledge sharing was not considered vital until modern modes of communication were developed. This is why both the positioning school and design school view strategy making coming from a centralized source. Design school assumes that environment is stable and predictable, and there is no uncertainty while the positioning school accepts that market place might change due to competitors and change in demand. But both the schools focus on the economic environment. This report makes a conclusion that the design school and the positioning school are two of the schools of strategy presented in the book. The design school became popular in later part of 1950s and focuses on creative strategy formulation by the leader with the aim of creating a fit between the outside environment and the competence of the firm. The positioning school was founded by Michael Porter and it focuses on strategy formulation as an analytical process. This school argues that finding the right industry for the firm is essential and offer model for choosing an industry. Then this school suggests that firm positions itself in the industry and then chooses a strategy relative to the position of the firm.